Forum > IL-2 Sturmovik
Tank Crew – Clash at Prokhorovka
Rinix:
Yes, they are excellent, and I wish that Steel Beasts had graphics that were that good. At the same time, I do like the graphics it has now.
Asid:
--- Quote from: Rinix on January 06, 2019, 04:44:08 PM ---Yes, they are excellent, and I wish that Steel Beasts had graphics that were that good. At the same time, I do like the graphics it has now.
--- End quote ---
We always wish for more....SB has an old engine which the developers are finding very difficult to update/add new things to. SB is still a great Tank simulation :thumbsup
Oleg:
You did not play this game? I would like to get feedback.
Lusik:
It's still in development although some vehicles have been released already. I tried Pz. III and T-34/76 which were quite immersive Tank behaviour seems very realistic but these two vehicles are modelled completely, like Tiger or KV-1 for instance. Driving is more realistic than in Steel beasts. You can feel the weight of the tank. It takes time to gain speed and the vehicle bounces on every bump. Damage modelling is also very good.
Regarding Steel Beast, I prefer realism over visuals although its driving experience could be better in SB. It's for more immersive in Il-2 or Steel Armour Blaze of War. I actually drove a real T-55 so I have something to compare it to. ;D
Overall Il-2 as a flight sim is much more immersive than I initially expected. I am a fan of DCS, in spite of its shortcomings, but comparing DCS WW2 aircraft and Il-2 I tend to enjoy the latter a bit more. There's something in it that takes you back 75 year into the past.
Oleg:
Thank you, there seems to be no alternative to the Steel Beasts yet.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page